hiw3c 日报精选
arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG 网页快照

快捷方式与边界:可验证强化学习失调与语境安全学习

原文标题 · Shortcuts and Boundaries: Verifiable RL Misalignment and Contextual Safety Learning

作者: Xinjie Shen | 强化学习(RL)可提升智能体的任务能力,同时强化违反上下文执行要求的行为。我们研究这种奖励驱动的错位现象,包括奖励操纵,通过可验证奖励——上下文冲突来探讨:合规任务完成仍可行,而某些可执行的捷径获得的奖励高于所有合规策略。编码这些

来源:arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG · arxiv.org

正文为英文,可一键机器翻译(仅首次需要等待)

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title: Shortcuts and Boundaries: Verifiable RL Misalignment and Contextual Safety Learning

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) can improve an agent's task capability while reinforcing behavior that violates contextual execution requirements. We study this reward-driven misalignment, including reward hacking, through verifiable reward--context conflicts, where compliant task completion remains feasible while some executable shortcuts earn more reward than every compliant strategy. Encoding these conflicts in task dynamics lets us generate diverse interactive environments at scale and derive compliance feedback from execution histories. In resource and reporting workflows, task optimization increases real productivity through unauthorized resource use or raises reported scores while actual work declines. Controlled changes in the training distribution show that minority conflict exposure can still lead to widespread shortcut acquisition, reaching 97.9\% certified profitable violations on an API task under a 25\% conflict mixture after 128 updates. The same contextual checks supply a simple binary penalty that supports joint capability and compliance gains and partially mitigates acquired violations. Learned safety adapts to expanded authorization and transfers across mechanisms into workflows with evolving evidence and approval requirements. On 32 unseen changing-evidence tasks, resource-trained safety increases safe completion from 53.1\% to 89.1\% relative to task-only training, while both policies achieve full real work. These results connect a verifiable account of reward-driven misalignment with scalable task construction and safety learning that remains useful under changing execution requirements.

Submission history

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Bookmark

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .