hiw3c 日报精选
arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG 网页快照

VLA信托应保留多少合理的理由?作为衡量行动价值的指导准则

原文标题 · How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function

作者:Dabin Seo, Eunhyek Joa | 推理-视语-行动(VLA)机制会生成一条推理路径,然后从中解码出相应的动作。如果推理路径有误,那么生成的动作也会出错;即便路径看起来正确,也可能误导后续的决策过程。目前的方法都是判断推理是否正确,而我们则试图确定这种推理应该具有多强的指导能力。CoC-CFG机制实现了一种无需分类器的引导方式,即让策略的上下文与同一上下文之间能够直接进行连接,

来源:arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG · arxiv.org

正文为英文,可一键机器翻译(仅首次需要等待)

Computer Science > Robotics

Title: How Much Should a VLA Trust Its Reasoning? Step-Level Guidance as a Measured Action-Value Function

Abstract: Reasoning vision-language-action (VLA) policies write a reasoning trace and then decode the action from it. A wrong trace yields a wrong action, and even a correct-looking trace can mislead the plan. Existing remedies ask whether the reasoning is right. We ask how strongly it should steer. CoC-CFG applies classifier-free guidance between the policy's context and the same context without the reasoning span. One weight per Euler step attenuates or amplifies the reasoning, and w=1 recovers the original policy. We treat the choice of this weight as a Markov decision process whose action values are measured, not bootstrapped. With the expert frozen and the noise fixed, applying a weight for one step and finishing the plan under the current controller returns that weight's value exactly. Q-adaptive guidance fits these values with small critics and improves the controller conservatively. In the Alpasim driving simulator it outperforms every fixed weight and online RL (SAC, GRPO) in open loop, and in closed loop it passes 262 of 300 scenes, against 252 for the original policy. On held-out frames of the Waymo end-to-end driving benchmark, its first three stages outperform every fixed weight, four adaptive-guidance methods, SAC and GRPO. On the hidden test set, a frozen Alpamayo 1.5 with rule-based camera and vehicle conversions and Q-adaptive guidance sets a new state of the art among published methods: 8.135159 rater feedback score, against 8.079 for the best published method.

Submission history

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Bookmark

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .