hiw3c 日报精选
arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG 网页快照

代理评估框架比较分析:企业分析代理中的稳定性、检测与发现

原文标题 · Comparative Analysis of Agent Evaluation Frameworks: Stability, Detection, and Discovery in Enterprise Analytics Agents

作者: Howard Zhang, Chuck Arvin, Logan Brown | 在企业环境中部署基于LLM的分析代理,需要能够可靠检测复杂、多工具工作流中的故障的评估框架。我们提出一项三阶段比较研究,针对三种评估框架进行比较,每种框架均代表一种不同的评估范式(基于追踪的LLM评估、仅基于文本的LLM评估及红队测试评估、确定性启发式方法),应用于两个

来源:arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG · arxiv.org

正文为英文,可一键机器翻译(仅首次需要等待)

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

Title: Comparative Analysis of Agent Evaluation Frameworks: Stability, Detection, and Discovery in Enterprise Analytics Agents

Abstract: Deploying LLM-based analytics agents in enterprise settings requires evaluation frameworks that can reliably detect failures across complex, multi-tool workflows. We present a three-phase comparative study of three evaluation frameworks, each representing a distinct evaluation paradigm (trace-based LLM judging, text-only LLM judging with red-teaming, and deterministic heuristics), applied to two analytics agents in a controlled research setting using frozen execution traces. Phase 1 quantifies evaluation harness stability through repeated measurements, finding that 97% of configurations meet the stability threshold and that stability patterns are agent-independent. Phase 2 measures known risk detection on 72 ground-truth test cases, where the trace-based framework achieves the best precision-recall balance (F1=0.90) while text-only evaluation matches on recall but generates 5x more false alarms. Phase 3 evaluates unknown risk discovery, uncovering 24 novel failures with zero overlap between functional testing and security red-teaming. Our results demonstrate that (1) the information available to the evaluation harness determines evaluation quality, (2) functional and security evaluation are complementary, and (3) LLM-based evaluation harnesses surface subtle errors that human reviewers miss. We recommend a two-framework strategy: trace-based evaluation for functional assessment and adversarial red-teaming for security validation.

Submission history

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Bookmark

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .