hiw3c AI 日报
arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG 网页快照

凯伦·布利森《七个哥特式故事》中的圣经互文性检索

原文标题 · Retrieving Biblical Intertextual References in Karen Blixen's Seven Gothic Tales

作者:András Kovács、Alexander Conroy、Daniel Hershcovich|识别互文参考文献是文学学术的核心,但当源材料通过重述、影射、历史语言和翻译进行转换时,在计算上很困难。我们通过凯伦·布利森的《七个哥特故事》中的圣经互文性来研究这个问题。根据评论版的评论,我们构建了一个包含189个注释参考的基准

来源:arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG · arxiv.org

正文为英文,可一键机器翻译(仅首次需要等待)

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: Retrieving Biblical Intertextual References in Karen Blixen's Seven Gothic Tales

Abstract: Identifying intertextual references is central to literary scholarship, but computationally difficult when source material is transformed through paraphrase, allusion, historical language, and translation. We investigate this problem through biblical intertextuality in Karen Blixen's Seven Gothic Tales. Drawing on the commentary to a critical edition, we construct a benchmark of 189 annotated references and evaluate retrieval against all 31,170 verses of historically plausible Danish Old and New Testament translations. We compare TF-IDF and BM25 with multilingual and Danish sentence encoders, examine the effect of linguistic normalization, and fine-tune a Danish encoder using hard negatives and five-fold cross-validation. We analyze performance across automatically derived lexical-overlap strata representing quotations, paraphrases, and allusions. Linguistically normalized BM25 provides a strong zero-shot baseline, attaining an overall R@10 of 0.365 and retrieving every quotation within its ten highest-ranked verses. The best zero-shot dense model achieves a comparable overall score of 0.360 while performing better on allusions. Fine-tuning DFM-large raises its overall R@10 from 0.265 to 0.508 and more than doubles its performance on allusions, from 0.138 to 0.339. However, evaluation against editorial annotations alone understates the model's scholarly usefulness: a literary scholar judged seven of 30 selected rank-one predictions counted as false positives to be meaningful additional references. These findings show both the potential and the epistemic limits of computational intertextual retrieval. Rather than treating scholarly annotations as exhaustive or model outputs as discoveries, we propose retrieval models as heuristic co-readers that recover documented references and generate candidates for expert-led close reading.

Submission history

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Bookmark

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .