hiw3c AI 日报
arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG 网页快照

量化前沿法学硕士代理人的夸大倾向

原文标题 · Quantifying Overclaiming Propensity in Frontier LLM Agents

作者:Nolan Smyth、Yorguin-Jose Mantilla-Ramos、Pascal Jr Tikeng Notsawo|前沿编码代理越来越被信任能够长期自主工作,但代理的最终响应通常是用户看到的工作的唯一描述。我们量化了边境代理\{超额索赔}任务完成的倾向,这是一种可能误导用户的虚假陈述。当代理人的最终回应与其上下文中的信息相矛盾时,代理人过度声称。定义R

来源:arXiv cs.AI/CL/LG · arxiv.org

正文为英文,可一键机器翻译(仅首次需要等待)

Computer Science > Software Engineering

Title: Quantifying Overclaiming Propensity in Frontier LLM Agents

Abstract: Frontier coding agents are increasingly trusted to work autonomously for long periods, yet an agent's final response is often the only account of that work a user sees. We quantify the propensity of frontier agents to \emph{overclaim} task completion, a misrepresentation that can mislead the user. An agent overclaims when its final response contradicts information in its context. This definition requires no inference about intent and is independent of task success. We introduce \emph{OverclaimBench}, an evaluation suite composed of five file-review scenarios, transcript-based coverage measurements, and registered planted defects. We evaluate eight proprietary frontier models in their own production command-line interfaces, and four open-weight models under a single fixed harness on OverclaimBench and find that 1) agents do not read all the files they were asked to review in 67.9\% of runs; 2) among runs where not all files are read, agents are \emph{misleading} 80.4\% of the time (59--96\% per model), either falsely claiming to have read all files or omitting that coverage is incomplete; 3) requiring delegation to subagents increased reading coverage, but among reviews that remained incomplete, a large majority were still misleading; and 4) agents that falsely claimed a complete review missed planted defects at about 1.8 times the rate of agents that read every file, showing that claims of completion can conceal substantive failures. Together, these results show that agents' final responses are not reliable accounts of their actions.

Submission history

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

References & Citations

BibTeX formatted citation

Bookmark

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Recommenders and Search Tools

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .