hiw3c 日报精选
Simon Willison 网页快照

引用了Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt和Qing Wang的观点

原文标题 · Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

我们认为,“是否有人阅读了代码?”这一表述并不准确,因为它无法反映“这个变更可能会出什么问题,以及应该使用哪种方式来进行检查——是自动化检查还是人工检查?”随着评审工作的进行,问题的提出方式也发生了改变。以前,评审工作是在项目结束时才进行的:编写代码后提交Pull请求,然后等待同事的审查。而现在,评审工作则持续进行着,就像在编写代码的同时进行拼写检查一样。大多数变更在有人来审查之前,至少已经由Cl

来源:Simon Willison · simonwillison.net

正文为英文,可一键机器翻译(仅首次需要等待)

Simon Willison’s Weblog

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang , How the Claude Code team does code review

Recent articles

Hello Python 3.15, goodbye 3.10, and now I can use 3.11 - 12th October 2026

A new feature for my blog, built using my voice - 9th October 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5 - 7th October 2026

We're going to need default hard budget caps on pretty much everything - 3rd October 2026

This is a quotation collected by Simon Willison, posted on 16th October 2026 .