Ex-FTC boss Khan urges Uncle Sam to break out the handcuffs for AI CEOs, citing 1934 precedent
There are plenty of laws on the books to hold companies, and potentially their execs, accountable
READ MORE
Microsoft drafts feel-good AI model guidelines and wants your input 10 hours ago
OpenAI's malicious bot swarm attacked RubyGems 16 hours ago
Teravolt looks to cannibalize older industries to meet AI power demand 21 hours ago
The myth of killer AI is a self-serving attempt at regulatory capture 1 day ago
Big AI sets out its terms for regulatory capture and calls it ‘Pace the frontier’ 1 day ago
Former FTC chair Lina Khan wants the federal government to know that it doesn't need to wait for new laws to address AI threats. There are already laws and regulations on the books, including a 92-year-old Supreme Court precedent, that she argues could be used to hold AI companies and, in some circumstances, their executives accountable for their actions.
Khan’s comments on X Sunday follow a flurry of activity from the leadership of OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, and xAI aimed at doing what can only be described as trying to corner regulators into giving them their way. The former Biden administration trust buster pointed to numerous examples of current laws, and prior precedent, that could be used to hold frontier labs to account, even if they’re currently doing all in their power to change the conversation.
“We shouldn’t let discussions about new legal regimes distract from the fact that there’s no AI exemption from laws already on the books,” Khan said. “Law enforcers already have authority to charge companies and their CEOs for creating and releasing dangerous, unvetted, or defective products.”
As one example, Khan points to laws governing dangerous and defective products as an avenue to prosecute AI leaders. She notes that the release of unvetted models or agents can violate consumer protection laws, and that shipping tools “without implementing adequate measures to detect and stop rogue or defective AI agents” could be prosecuted under rules governing unfair and deceptive trade practices. Particularly timely, Khan also pointed to existing laws prohibiting unfair methods of competition. This, she notes, includes cases “where firms pursue dangerous behavior, aware that doing so may compel rivals to do the same.”
There’s no leap needed to understand what Khan’s talking about here. OpenAI’s agents broke out of their intended sandbox and gained unauthorized access to Hugging Face systems - conduct that could raise serious criminal-law questions if carried out knowingly by a human. After doing some digging to look at its own agents' behaviors, Anthropic has essentially copped to similar activities that would be criminal if a meatbag was behind the keyboard instead of a simulated silicon brain. OpenAI’s agents have since been identified as the culprits in other misuses of online assets that, again, would be crimes were they perpetrated by a human.
Khan points to a 1934 US Supreme Court decision to argue that the current battle between American frontier labs, which has put parts of the internet in the firing line of agents that escaped their intended constraints , could amount to an unfair method of competition if companies feel compelled to take similar risks to keep up.
That decision, FTC v. R.F. Keppel & Bro, includes a passage where the justices argue that, if keeping up with the competition requires companies to “descend to a practice which they are under a powerful moral compulsion not to adopt,” that competition is unfair whether or not it’s criminal.
Without weighing in on who shot first, OpenAI and Anthropic appear locked in a race to build increasingly capable AI while also warning, as both did over the weekend, that those systems could become dangerous without stronger safeguards and coordinated limits.
Aside from the bad activity of the frontier labs themselves, Khan points out that the “highly concentrated and interconnected structure” of the AI industry also merits scrutiny for its potential to create “major risks and conflicts of interest.”
Again, Khan points out this isn’t a hypothetical.
“OpenAI could face liability given the Hugging Face incident, but Hugging Face being bought up by Nvidia means that we’re unlikely to see it file a lawsuit over this,” Khan noted, “given Nvidia’s strong incentive to see OpenAI continue full speed ahead.”
Nvidia has dumped billions of dollars into OpenAI, becoming a centerpiece of the lab’s datacenters that power ChatGPT. Why, then, would the soon-to-be-owner of Hugging Face opt to hold one of its major partners accountable and further push it to build its own hardware ?
“We can and must pursue any new efforts alongside enforcing existing laws,” Khan said. Let’s be frank, though: The current administration is unlikely to do anything except capitulate and allow the AI industry to capture its regulators, if it even bothers to implement new regulations at all.
Trump has already rejected the AI industry’s weekend calls for regulation, declaring himself to be the only guardrail the AI industry needs.
As the AI industry leaders basically admitted over the weekend, whichever one of them blinks first stands to lose, so every single frontier lab in the US is going to keep pushing full steam ahead unless all of them agree to hit the brakes and pace their development. With Trump and other Republican leaders rejecting those calls, Khan’s argument leaves her former agency and other state and federal regulators as potential avenues for action.
Kirk Sigmon, a founding partner at technology law firm KellDann Law, told us that it’s unlikely federal regulators will take any action.
“Most governments are desperate not to kill a nascent technology as it grows, especially when other countries are allowing it to grow,” Sigmon told The Register . He said the only actions against the industry he expects to see in the next few years are “easy wins” in places like deepfake porn, impersonation, and AI-enabled scams. “I very much doubt we'll see much action … against the entire process of training, or the like - that's likely to be perceived as strangling the industry.”
In other words, fire up the boilers - it’s full speed ahead toward the day AI does something truly devastating and we all gnash our teeth and wail about how something should have been done earlier. ®
UK's Digital ID walks into a bar... two months after being killed off
The national scheme may be dead, but digital IDs can now prove you're old enough to buy booze
PostgreSQL 19 graph queries fail the 'would you ship this?' test
SQL/PGQ gets bounced over unresolved bugs as concurrent REPACK promises fewer midnight calls for DBAs
HPE makes its “unified storage” claim real as B10000 R6 hits GA
PARTNER CONTENT: Pairs block and adjacent file workloads with independent scaling of performance and capacity
Give Xfce a Mac or Unity-style makeover
The existing layouts are fun, but there's much more we can do
Europe's right-to-repair rules are broken, not beaten
Patchy compliance is an argument for stronger enforcement, not abandoning the project
Open weights are not open source: Why AI's favorite label is under dispute
Downloading a model is increasingly easy. Understanding how it was made, or changing a system at its root, is another matter
TOP STORIES
PERSONAL TECH Smartphone makers don't bother to comply with EU repairability requirements
NETWORKS Virgin Media offloads email services to third-party provider
offbeat Retired man turns spare room into Soviet-era supercomputer
CYBER-CRIME Ukrainian lawyer's second career as a Conti coder earns him 4 years behind bars
software Another Microsoft team admits it’s struggling to handle flood of AI-generated code
virtualization VMware defends ending downloads of SDK that helps VM backups – or migrations to rivals
AI
on-prem Datacenter developers want your backyard. FAS says negotiate harder Tax breaks, water, noise, decommissioning - report tells local officials what to nail down before signing
LEGAL Nvidia's Groq acquihire is on the DOJ's radar, but it's already too late Even if regulators did somehow unwind the $20B deal, there's a growing list of alternatives ready to take Groq's place, no merger required
SECURITY Watch out: Apple timepiece can grab snippets of conversation without both speakers' consent War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Privacy is surveillance
SYSTEMS d-Matrix drinks the Nvidia Kool-Aid with NVLink Fusion and MGX rack designs AI infrastructure startup joins Qualcomm, Arm, Marvell, Amazon, Fujitsu, and MediaTek as NVLink true believers
ai and ml Anthropic reveals fourth likely crime committed by its AI Claude's Felony Bench rap sheet is now as long as OpenAI's
Infosec
Security Russians are posing as Signal support to launch phishing attacks PLUS: US takes down Iranian propaganda sites; Marketing company asks 'Why Do We Have Your Information?' And more!
Security Microsoft patches failed to fix on-prem SharePoint, which is now under zero-day attack PLUS: China upgrades smartphone surveillance tools; Ring eases anti-snooping stance; and more
Black Hat and DEF CON DEF CON Franklin project enlists hackers to harden critical infrastructure Voting village reports have been so successful, says Jeff Moss, that the whole of DEF CON will now be included
Security EQT buys majority share in Swiss cybersecurity biz Acronis Went at equivalent of $3.5B+ valuation for entire firm, though portion sold not specified
Malware Month Ten years since the first corp ransomware, Mikko Hyppönen sees no end in sight On the plus side, infosec's a good bet for a long, stable career
FOSS
Shopify extends lifeline to Tailwind as vibe coding erodes web dev platform's bottom line Acquisition gives open source CSS framework 'a stable long-term home'
Switzerland tests a FOSS escape route from Microsoft 365 Swiss Army sticks a knife in American cloud apps with its own FOSS push
Feel peak Windows was 7? You might like Kumander Linux Debian and Xfce – solid, sensible choices – with a pretty skin
Canonical shuttering some of its legacy chat channels The Ubuntu Pastebin went in June, IRC gets demoted next
Audacity audio-editing app no longer looks like it's from the early 2000s The FOSS tool for audio editing has a fresh coat of paint, and new features to boot
Haiku OS rises / Beta 6 sails open web / Virtual winds fly fast A real alternative to running some kind of FOSS Unix clone